TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

White v. State

WHITE Et Al. v. STATE

White v. State, 150 P. 718 (Okla. 1915)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · State Highest Courts
Decided
July 13, 1915
Docket
No. 4891
Judges
Devereux
Citations
150 P. 71850 Okla. 1041915 Okla. LEXIS 393
Disposition
Affirmed.
Syllabus
ACTION ON APPEARANCE BOND. The facts in this case are identical with those in White et al. v. State, ante, p. 97, 150 Pac. 716, and the syllabus in that case is adopted as the one in .this case. (Syllabus by Devereux, C.)
Summary
Error from County Court, Seminole County; T. S. Cobb, Judge. Notion by the State against W. J. White and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Devereux

Opinion by DEVEREUX, C.

The facts in this case are identical with those in White et al. v. State, ante, p. 97, and we adopt the decision in that case as the decision in the present case.

We therefore recommend that the judgment be affirmed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1916: 11942: 21982: 119162026peak 1942 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State ex rel. Commissioners of Land Office v. Hall1942 OK 41, 128 P.2d 838
  2. State ex rel. Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Emery645 P.2d 1048 (Okla. Civ. App. 1982)
  3. Wooten v. State ex rel. Comr's of Land Office1942 OK 323, 129 P.2d 584
  4. Petroleum Iron Works Co. v. Bullington1916 OK 997, 161 P. 538

Most recent

  1. State ex rel. Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Emery645 P.2d 1048 (Okla. Civ. App. 1982)
  2. Wooten v. State ex rel. Comr's of Land Office1942 OK 323, 129 P.2d 584
  3. State ex rel. Commissioners of Land Office v. Hall1942 OK 41, 128 P.2d 838
  4. Petroleum Iron Works Co. v. Bullington1916 OK 997, 161 P. 538

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list