TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Ex Parte Logan

Ex Parte Logan. Williams v. Sale

Ex Parte Logan, 1912 OK 29, 126 P. 800
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 9, 1912
Docket
No. 2108
Judges
DUNN, J.
Citations
126 P. 8001912 OK 2933 Okla. 6591912 Okla. LEXIS 769

Opinion of the Court

This case presents error from the district court of Cleveland county. Plaintiff in error, Robert Logan, being held in the county jail of Cleveland county for the purpose of extradition for an offense alleged to have been committed in the state of Tennessee, by and through Ben F. Williams, Jr., Esq., brought habeas corpus in the district court of said county to secure his release. The court denied the application, and remanded him to the custody of the sheriff and jailer of the said county, where it appears he has since been held. Time was taken to prepare, make, and serve a case-made for this court, and the same has been duly lodged herein.

Counsel for defendants in error have filed a motion to dismiss the same, for the reason that the order made by the court is not of that final and conclusive character necessary to support a proceeding in error, and that no right of appeal to this court exists. The question presented and argued has recently been passed upon by the Criminal Court of Appeals in the case of Ex parte Johnson, 1 Okla. Cr. 414 , 98 P. 461 , and by this court in Wisener, Sheriff, v. Burrell, 28 Okla. 546 , 118 P. 999 , 34 L. R. A. (N. S.) 755, and in each of these cases it was held that an appeal does not lie from such an order. The conclusion was reached after a full consideration of the question, and in our judgment is supported by the weight of authority and the better reasoning, and we find in the arguments of counsel in this cause no reason to change the same.

The motion is accordingly sustained, and the proceeding in error dismissed.

TURNER, C. J., and HAYES and KANE, JJ., concur; WILLIAMS, J., dissenting. *Page 661

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1927: 11944: 12010: 119272026peak 1927 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State v. Powell2010 OK 40, 237 P.3d 779
  2. Ex Parte Owens1927 OK CR 171, 258 P. 758
  3. Ex Parte Kincade1944 OK 245, 151 P.2d 796

Most recent

  1. State v. Powell2010 OK 40, 237 P.3d 779
  2. Ex Parte Kincade1944 OK 245, 151 P.2d 796
  3. Ex Parte Owens1927 OK CR 171, 258 P. 758

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Ex Parte Johnson, 1908 OK CR 35, 98 P. 461 38
Wisener v. Burrell, 1911 OK 128, 118 P. 999 15

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list