TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

High v. United States

Daniel High v. the United States, E. A. Hitchcock, Secretary of the Interior, W. A. Richards, Assistant Commissioner of the General Land Office, F. C. Sickles, Register, and T. R. Reid, Receiver of the U. S. Land Office at El Reno, Oklahoma Territory

High v. United States, 1904 OK 100, 78 P. 100
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · State Highest Courts
Decided
September 3, 1904
Judges
Beauchamp, Irwin, Pancoast
Citations
78 P. 1001904 OK 10014 Okla. 3991904 Okla. LEXIS 94
Syllabus
APPEAL — Case Made. A case made which does not contain a copy or statement of the pleadings, any motion for a new trial, or' any final order of judgment of the trial court, but merely a purported transcript of the stenographer’s notes of the evidence, presents no question to this court for review. (Syllabus by the Court.)
Summary
Error from the District Court of Canadian County; before Clinton F. Irwin, Trial Judge.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Beauchamp

Opinion of the court by Beauchamp, J.

This case comes here on appeal from the district court of Canadian county, sitting with the pow *400 ers of a circuit court of the United States, under the provisions of the act of congress, approved February 6, 1901,. 31 Statutes at Large, page 760. Attached to the petition in error is what purports to be a case made, which contains only the stenographer’s transcript to the "evidence. There are no pleadings shown in the record, no judgment or final order of the court, no motion for a new trial, and no record by which we can determine what the issues were or that any disposition was ever made of the ease; merely a recital in the stenographer’s transcript to the effect that upon the conclusion of the plaintiff’s testimony, defendants demurred to the evidence, and the court sustained the demurrer, to-which ruling the plaintiff excepted. The record is wholly insufficient to present such a case made as will enable this court to review the errors assigned by plaintiff in error.

See Board of Commissioners of Custer Co. v. Moon, 8 Okla. 205 , and cases cited.

The petition in error, therefore is dismissed, with costs to plaintiff in error.

Irwin, J., who presided in the court below, not sitting; Pancoast, J., absent; all the other Justices concurring.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1907: 11914: 119072026peak 1907 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Stark Bros. v. Glaser1907 OK 148, 91 P. 1040
  2. Mobley v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.1915 OK 600, 145 P. 321

Most recent

  1. Mobley v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.1915 OK 600, 145 P. 321
  2. Stark Bros. v. Glaser1907 OK 148, 91 P. 1040

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Bd. of Comrs. Custer Co. v. Moon, 1899 OK 4, 57 P. 161 14

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list