TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Jones v. State

David Jones v. State.

Jones v. State, 1945 OK CR 76, 161 P.2d 89
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · State Appellate Courts
Decided
August 1, 1945
Docket
No. A-10455.
Judges
Jones, Barefoot, Doyle
Citations
161 P.2d 891945 OK CR 7681 Okla. Crim. 1271945 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 208

Opinion of the Court — Jones

JONES, J.

The defendant, David Jones, was charged by information filed in the district court of Stephens *128 county, together with R. D. Mooneyhan, Loyd Sheehan, and Elmer Petty, with the crime of burglary in the second degree; was tried separately, found guilty, sentenced to serve a term of two years imprisonment in the State Penitentiary, and has appealed.

The Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal and affirm the judgment of the trial court on the ground that, although the petition in error with case-made attached has been filed herein for many months, no brief has been filed on behalf of the defendant and that his counsel failed to appear on March 21, 1945, at the time the case was set for oral argument, and, further, that the appeal is without merit and taken for delay only.

Section 9 of the Rules of the Criminal Court of Appeals provides:

“When no counsel appears, and no briefs are filed, the court will examine the pleadings, the instructions of the court, and the exceptions taken thereto, and the judgment and sentence, and if no prejudicial error appears, will affirm the judgment.”

We have examined the record herein and find the evidence is sufficient to show the defendant guilty of the crime of burglary of a building belonging to the Ice Service Company, in the city of Duncan. The instructions fairly state the law of the case and there are no fundamental errors apparent in the record. No brief has been filed and no appearance on behalf of accused was made at the time the case was set for argument. The motion of the Attorney General is therefore sustained and the judgment of the district court of Stephens county is affirmed.

BAREFOOT, P. J., concurs. DOYLE, J., not participating.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1946: 219462026peak 1946 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Petty v. State1946 OK CR 103, 174 P.2d 274
  2. Sheehan v. State1946 OK CR 87, 172 P.2d 809

Most recent

  1. Petty v. State1946 OK CR 103, 174 P.2d 274
  2. Sheehan v. State1946 OK CR 87, 172 P.2d 809

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list