Talley v. State
Tom Talley v. State.
Syllabus
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
*529 FUEMAN, PRESIDING Judge.
On the 9th day of December, 1909, judgment was pronounced against appellant in the two above-numbered cases for violations of the prohibitory liquor law, and in each case his punishment was assessed at 30 da)'®’ confinement in the county jail and a fine of $150.
In each case he was granted 60 days within which to prepare and serve a case-made. The record shows that a case-made-ivas served on the county attorney in both of the above cases, but fails to show that it was served within the time allowed by the-trial court. This is not a compliance with the law. The record must positively and affirmatively show that the case-made was served upon the county attorney within the time fixed by the trial court for that purpose, or the case-made will be stricken from the-the record. Cohn v. State, 4 Okla. Cr. 492 , 113 Pac. 219 . The case-made in each case is therefore stricken from the record.
We find no error in the transcript of the record in either case, and both judgments are therefore affirmed.
ABMSTEONG and DOYLE, Judges, concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.