Kendrick v. State
Jack Kendrick v. State.
Syllabus
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
ARMSTRONG, J.
The plaintiff in error, Jack Kendrick, was convicted at the January, 1914, term of the county court of Jefferson comity on a charge of unlawfully selling intoxicating liquor, and .his punishment fixed at imprisonment in the county jail for a period of 30 days and a fine of $50.
The material facts, as testified to by the prosecuting witness, and admitted by the plaintiff in error, are substantially as follows: Claud Jay testified that he was in Waurika about the 6th day of December, 1913; that he met the plaintiff in error, Jack Kendrick, and asked him if he knew where he could get some whisky. He said that he did. He (Jay) then gave the plaintiff in error $5 in currency and told him to get a pint. Thej'' agreed upon a place to meet within a short time. Witness went to this place and there met the plaintiff in error, who delivered to him the pint of whisky and returned him all the money except $1.35. The whisky cost a dollar, but the plaintiff in error did not have correct change to pay the thirty-five cents.
*381 Updn the authority of Buchanan v. State, 4 Okla. Cr. 645 , 112 Pac. 32 , 36 L. R. A. (N. S.) 83, and Cantrell v. State, 10 Okla. Cr. 304 , 135 Pac. 1158 , the judgment is affirmed.
DOYLE, P. J., concurs. FURMAN, J., absent.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.