Jones v. City of Lubbock
Rev. Roy Jones, Rose Wilson, Individually and as Representative of the Black and Mexican-American Voters of Lubbock, Texas, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant v. The City of Lubbock
Opinion
682 F.2d 504
Rev. Roy JONES, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, Rose Wilson, individually and as representative of the Black and Mexican-American Voters of Lubbock, Texas, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant, v. The CITY OF LUBBOCK, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 79-2744.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Unit A
Aug. 13, 1982.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas; Halbert O. Woodward, Chief Judge.
William L. Garrett, Dallas, Tex., Daniel H. Benson, Lubbock, Tex., Robert P. Davidow, George Mason Univ., Arlington, Va., Albert Perez, Mark C. Hall, Lane Arthur, Lubbock, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellants.
James P. Brewster, Trial Atty., Dennis W. McGill, Travis D. Shelton, Lubbock, Tex., for defendants-appellees.
ON REHEARING
Before GOLDBERG, POLITZ and JOHNSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
On appeal, 640 F.2d 777 (5th Cir. 1981), we reversed and remanded for reconsideration in light of the Supreme Court's intervening decision in City of Mobile v. Bolden, 446 U.S. 55 , 100 S.Ct. 1490 , 64 L.Ed.2d 47 (1980). Shortly thereafter the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Rogers v. Lodge and we recalled and have withheld our mandate. That case has now been decided, --- U.S. ----, 102 S.Ct. 3272 , 72 L.Ed.2d ---- (1982). Consistent therewith, sua sponte, we grant rehearing and supplement our opinion to instruct the district court, in its re-examination, to give appropriate consideration to the teachings contained in Rogers v. Lodge.
2
REVERSED and REMANDED.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.