Box v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.
Syllabus
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Opinion by MATHEWS, C.
The only question presented by the appeal is whether or not a railroad company is liable to one owning or occupying land adjoining the railroad right of way for damages to crops incurred from trespassing animals entering on said land by reason of the failure of the railroad company to properly fence its adjacent right of way.
In the very recent case of Missouri, O. & G. Ry. Co. v. Webb, 46 Okla. 740 , 148 Pac. 1042 , by this court, this exact question was answered in the negative. For reason and authorities, see that case.
We recommend that the judgment be affirmed.
By the Court: It is so ordered.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.