Massey v. Sinopoulo
Massey v. Sinopoulo.
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This is a companion-case to that of Cooke et al. v. Sinopoulo, No. 31426, 194 Okla. 352 , 151 P. 2d 791 . The issues of law and fact are identical save for the naipe of the plaintiff in error and the amount involved. The same authorities are-cited and the same contentions are made here as were made in the former case. What we have therein said is controlling here in every detail. For this reason the syllabus in the above case is adopted as the syllabus herein.
Judgment affirmed.
CORN, C. J., GIBSON, V.C.J., and RILEY, OSBORN, BAYLESS, HURST, and DAVISON, JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.