TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Edgell v. Edgell

Edgell v. Edgell, 1926 OK 951, 251 P. 43
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 30, 1926
Docket
No. 16187
Judges
Maxey
Citations
251 P. 431926 OK 951120 Okla. 2811926 Okla. LEXIS 454

Opinion of the Court — Maxey

Opinion by MAXEY, C.

This action was instituted in the district court of Oklahoma county by the plaintiff in error, Zephro Ed-gell, against the defendant in error, seeking a divorce from said defendant, alleging that said defendant had been guilty of extreme cruelty towards the plaintiff, both in private and in public, and had been guilty of indiscretions and indecencies with various other men, and conducted the home in such manner that the two little girls, children of the plaintiff and defendant, should be immed’a-tely removed therefrom.

The defendant denied the allegations of the plaintiff’s .petition, and the case was heard before the court, without a jury, and at the conclusion of the testimony the court found that if the defendant had been guilty of adultery with other men, the plaintiff had condoned the offense by sleeping with her and having marital relations on Sunday night before he filed this suit on Monday. This fact was admitted by both plaintiff and defendant, and at the close of the testimony the court delivered a long lecture to the parties. and gave them some wholesome advice. He denied the divorce to the plaintiff, and the defendant did not ask for one, but he awarded the custody of the children to the defendant and required the plaintiff to make provisions for their support.

IVe have read all of the material testimony in the case and have read the conclusions of the law reached by the court and his findings of fact, and are satisfied that he reached the proper conclusion, and that full justice was done the parties. The judgment of the district court is, therefore, affirmed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1934: 11979: 119342026peak 1934 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Deberry v. Deberry177 S.E. 440 (W. Va. 1934)
  2. Tigert v. Tigert595 P.2d 815 (Okla. Civ. App. 1979)

Most recent

  1. Tigert v. Tigert595 P.2d 815 (Okla. Civ. App. 1979)
  2. Deberry v. Deberry177 S.E. 440 (W. Va. 1934)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list