Bird v. Palmer
BIRD Et Al. v. PALMER Et Al.
Bird v. Palmer, 1931 OK 460, 3 P.2d 694
Opinion of the Court
ANDREWS, J.
This cause was consolidated with cause No. 19979. The decision in the consolidated cause was this day rendered in cause No. 19979 between the same parties. 151 Okla. 3 , 3 P. (2d) 890 . The law announced therein is applied herein.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
LESTER, C. J., and HEFNER, CULLI-SON, SWINDALL, McNEILL, and KORNE-GAY, JJ., concur. CLARK, V. O. J., absent. RILEY, J., dissents.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 4 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(jury returned a special verdict setting out facts but did not specify the amount of damages to awarded in the judgment, and then the court assessed the amount of damages and rendered judgment for plaintiff)
Cited by 6 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.