Bergin Oil & Gas Co. v. Howard
BERGIN OIL & GAS CO. v. HOWARD, State Auditor
Syllabus
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
ELTING, J.
The same questions are involved in this case as were involved.in the case of In re Gross Production Tax of the Wolverine Oil Company (No. 7426), found in 53 Okla. 24 , 154 Pac. 362 . The validity of said act was affirmed in said opinion. The questions raised in the instant case are decided by authority of said case, except wherein the court held said gross production tax to be an occupátion tax instead of a property tax and in so far as such holding is material and inconsistent with .the opinion by Chief Justice Harrison heretofore cited.
, The said ‘holding in said opinion where-j in it waS held that said tax was an occupation tax is overruled, and we hold here|in said tax to be a property tax and not an ‘occupation tax, in conformity with the : opinion rendered by Chief Justice Harrison ; (opinion filed April 5, 1921, and reported i in 81 Okla. 134 , 197 Pac. 495 ) entitled, “In re Protest Skelton Lead & Zinc Company's Gross Production Tax for 1919.”
The holding of Chief Justice Harrison on the nature of said tax is set out in the second paragraph of the sylllabus of his said opinion, and the law so defined in said second paragraph of the syllabus is held to be the law herein, and the validity of said act approved March 11, 1915, is affirmed.
All the Justices concurring.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.