TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Excise Board of Kay County v. Chicago, R.I. P. Ry.

Excise Board of Kay County v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.

Excise Bd. of Kay Cnty. v. Chicago, R.I. P. Ry., 1932 OK 74, 7 P.2d 902
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · State Highest Courts
Decided
February 2, 1932
Docket
No. 22245
Judges
Andrews, Lester, Clark, Riley, Hbener, Oüllison, Swin-Dall, McNeill, Kornegay
Citations
7 P.2d 9021932 OK 74155 Okla. 341932 Okla. LEXIS 69
Cited by 4

Opinion of the Court — Andrews

ANDREWS, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Court of Tax Review in favor of the protestant, Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company, and against the excise board of Kay county, Okla., involving appropriations and levies made by the excise board of Kay county for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1931.

*35 The parties hereto have stipulated and ■agreed that the decision of this court in cause No. 22128, Caddo County, Oklahoma, Company (this day rendered)' T55 Okla. 82, 7 P. (2d) 800 , shall be controlling herein. Pursuant to that stipulation, the law as announced in that case is applied and, pursuant thereto, the judgment of the Court of Tax Review is affirmed.

LESTER, C. J., CLARK, Y. C. .7., and RILEY, HBENER, OüLLISON, SWIN-DALL, McNEILL, and KORNEGAY, JL, concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 4 cases

View all citing references →
1932: 11938: 11958: 219322026peak 1958 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Shaw v. Fox55 S.W.2d 11 (Ky. Ct. App. 1932)
  2. Anderson v. Walker1958 OK 297, 333 P.2d 570
  3. Haas v. Holloman1958 OK 174, 327 P.2d 655
  4. Thompson v. Stanley1938 OK 488, 83 P.2d 386

Most recent

  1. Anderson v. Walker1958 OK 297, 333 P.2d 570
  2. Haas v. Holloman1958 OK 174, 327 P.2d 655
  3. Thompson v. Stanley1938 OK 488, 83 P.2d 386
  4. Shaw v. Fox55 S.W.2d 11 (Ky. Ct. App. 1932)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list