TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Price v. Board of Comrs. Pawnee Co.

Benjamin Price Et Al. v. Board of Commissioners of Pawnee County Et Al.

Price v. Bd. of Comrs. Pawnee Co., 1899 OK 39, 56 P. 959
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · State Highest Courts
Decided
February 11, 1899
Judges
Bubwell
Citations
56 P. 9591899 OK 398 Okla. 1211899 Okla. LEXIS 32
Disposition
Dismissed.
Syllabus
Appeal — Dismissed. Where all of the parties to an action pending-in the supreme court on appeal from an inferior court, before-the questions presented by the appeal are determined by the appellate court, compromise and settle all of the matters involved therein, and such fact is made to appear to the supreme court by affidavits and certified copies of official records, all of which are-undisputed by the appellant, the appeal will be dismissed. (Syllabus by the Court.)
Summary
Error from the District Court of Pawnee County; before AG. C. Bierer, District Judge. Actions between Benjamin Price and others and J. F. Johnson and others and John N. Florer and others and the board of county commissioners of Pawnee county and -others. From the judgments, Price and others bring error.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Bubwell

■Opinion of the court by Bubwell, J.:

The above-entitled cases, although separate and distinct from each other, involve the same question of practice, and we will therefore dispose- of them all -together.

Since the plaintiffs in error filed their appeals in this ■court, the matters involved in each of the above-entitled cases have been fully settled and compromised, as shown by affidavits of the defendants in error filed in this court in support of their respective motions to dismiss the. appeals, which affidavits are undenied by the plaintiffs in ■error. This being true, the court will not consider any of the questions therein, and each of the above cases-should be dismissed, at the cost of the appellants. It is so ordered.

All of the Justices concurring.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1911: 11914: 11915: 11916: 11922: 119112026peak 1911 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Pyeatt v. Estus1916 OK 607, 179 P. 42
  2. Smith v. Boatman1911 OK 432, 120 P. 599
  3. Poole v. Higgins1914 OK 492, 143 P. 666
  4. Doyle v. Clapp1922 OK 189, 209 P. 324
  5. Bush v. Ætna Building & Loan Ass'n of Las Vegas1915 OK 632, 151 P. 850

Most recent

  1. Doyle v. Clapp1922 OK 189, 209 P. 324
  2. Pyeatt v. Estus1916 OK 607, 179 P. 42
  3. Bush v. Ætna Building & Loan Ass'n of Las Vegas1915 OK 632, 151 P. 850
  4. Poole v. Higgins1914 OK 492, 143 P. 666
  5. Smith v. Boatman1911 OK 432, 120 P. 599

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list