TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Buchanan v. Loving

BUCHANAN v. LOVING Et Al.

Buchanan v. Loving, 1912 OK 789, 128 P. 499
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · State Highest Courts
Decided
December 3, 1912
Docket
No. 4409
Judges
Kane
Citations
128 P. 4991912 OK 78935 Okla. 2071912 Okla. LEXIS 548
Disposition
Dismissed.
Syllabus
APPEAL AND EBBOE — Petition in Error — Case-Made—Filing. Syllabus same as itolater v. Strain, 31 Olda. 58, 119 Pac. 992. (Syllabus by-the Court.)
Summary
Error from District Court, Jackson County; Frank Matthews, Judge. Action between W. H. Buchanan and W. J. Loving and J. H. Loving. From the judgment, Buchanan brings error.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Kane

KANE, J- This cause comes on to be heard upon a motion by the defendants in error to dismiss the appeal, upon the ground that the case-made and petition in error were not filed in the Supreme Court within six months after the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial in the district court was rendered. The record shows that the order overruling the motion for a new trial was entered on the 30th day of September, 1911, and that thé case-made was filed in the Supreme Court on the 30th day of September, 1912. As the Session Laws of 1911, c. 18, p. 35, requiring appeals to be taken in six months, became effective on the 14th day of June, 1911, the petition in error and case-made should have been filed within six months after the date of the rendition of judgment overruling the motion for new trial.

Rolater v. Strain, 31 Okla. 58 , 119 Pac. 992 .

The appeal is therefore dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1913: 119132026peak 1913 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Bell v. Bearman1913 OK 421, 133 P. 188

Most recent

  1. Bell v. Bearman1913 OK 421, 133 P. 188

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Rolater v. Strain, 1911 OK 426, 119 P. 992 18

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list