TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Marple v. Farmers' & Merchants' Nat. Bank of Nocona

Marple v. Farmers’ & Merchants’ Nat. Bank of Nocona, Texas

Marple v. Farmers' & Merchants' Nat. Bank of Nocona, 1911 OK 170, 115 P. 1124
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 9, 1911
Docket
No. 799
Judges
Kane
Citations
115 P. 11241911 OK 17028 Okla. 8101911 Okla. LEXIS 208
Disposition
Dismissed.
Summary
Error from Jefferson County Court; G. M. Bond, Judge. Action between John Marple and the Farmers’ and Merchants’ National Bank, of Nocona, Texas. From the judgment, Marple brings error.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Kane

KANE, J.

The above entitled cause was filed in this court on the 23rd day of April, 1909, but has not been briefed by any of the parties. It now comes on to be heard upon a motion to dismiss by defendant in error, upon, among others, the following grounds: First, because the case-made on file in this court was never filed in the court below, as provided by law; second, no summons in error was ever issued or served on defendant in error or its counsel, nor has such issuance and service been waived;

*811 third, because neither the case-made nor a copy thereof was served upon defendant in error or its counsel; fourth, because the certificate of the county judge before whom said cause was tried certifying to the ease-made now on file in this court was never attested by the clerk of said county court, as provided by law. We find that each ground for dismissal assigned is well taken, and, as any one of them will be fatal to the review of the errors complained of by this court, the motion to dismiss the appeal must be sustained.

All the Justices concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1912: 21913: 51915: 119122026peak 1913 · 5

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Hope v. Peck1913 OK 472, 134 P. 33
  2. Brooks v. United Mine Workers of America1912 OK 715, 128 P. 236
  3. Ft. Smith W. R. Co. v. McKee1913 OK 328, 132 P. 497
  4. Abbott v. Rodgers1912 OK 787, 128 P. 908
  5. Oklahoma City v. McKean1913 OK 513, 135 P. 19
  6. Wyant v. Beavers1915 OK 510, 150 P. 480

Most recent

  1. Wyant v. Beavers1915 OK 510, 150 P. 480
  2. Graham v. Atwood1913 OK 691, 136 P. 1080
  3. Harmon v. McCormack1913 OK 587, 135 P. 1052
  4. Oklahoma City v. McKean1913 OK 513, 135 P. 19
  5. Hope v. Peck1913 OK 472, 134 P. 33
  6. Ft. Smith W. R. Co. v. McKee1913 OK 328, 132 P. 497

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list