Oklahoma City v. Myers
Oklahoma City v. Myers.
Opinion of the Court
OSBORN, Y. C. J.
George M. Myers, as plaintiff, sued the city of Oklahoma City, as defendant, in the district court of Oklahoma county to recover damages arising from the negligent operation of the city’s sewer system. The cause was tried to a jury, and a verdict was rendered in favor of plaintiff for $800. From a judgment thereon, defendant has appealed.
Plaintiff was the owner and occupant of a tract of land situated northeast of the city of Oklahoma City and adjacent to the North Canadian river. The city of Oklahoma City emptied its sewage into said river. It appears that either by the negligent operation of the sewage system or by improperly treating the sewage there was created foul, *623 noisome, and noxious odors in tlie vicinity oí piaintiff’s residence and farm which caused discomfort, annoyance, and inconvenience to plaintiff and his family.
An examination of tlie briefs discloses that the identical propositions relied upon by defendant herein were this day determined in City of Oklahoma City v. Eylar, 177 Okla. 616 , 61 P. (2d) 649 , and the opinion of the court in that case is hereby adopted as controlling of the issues involved herein.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
McNEILL, O. J., and BAYLESS, BUSBY, WELCH, PHELPS, and COHN, JJ., concur. RILEY and GIBSON, JJ., dissent.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.