Dunlap v. C. T. Herring Lumber Co.
DUNLAP v. C. T. HERRING LUMBER CO. Et Al.
Syllabus
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Opinion by THACKER, C.
This case was tried in the district court upon an agreed statement of facts upon which judgment was entered for plaintiff on the 5th day of August, 1911 ; and on the same date the defendant E. F. Dunlap filed motion for new trial, which was on the 30th day of August, 1911, overruled, and time then granted in which to serve a case-made. As has been repeatedly held by this court, a motion for a new trial is unauthorized where a case is tried upon an agreed statement of facts alone; and such motion does not operate to extend the period of three days allowed by statute in force at the date of the entry of judgment in this case, and therefore the order entered on the 30th day of August, 1911, extending such time, was a nullity, and does not confer upon this court jurisdiction to consider this case on appeal. See, School District No. 38, Hughes County, ex rel. F. M. Hale, Director, v. B. W. Mackey, Co. Treasurer, ante, 144 Pac. 1032 , and cases there cited.
For the reasons stated, the appeal should be dismissed.
By the Court: It is so ordered.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 6 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.