TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Easterwood v. State

Webb Easterwood v. State.

Easterwood v. State, 1927 OK CR 255, 259 P. 181
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · State Appellate Courts
Decided
August 27, 1927
Docket
No. A-5881.
Judges
Edwards, Doyle, Davenport
Citations
259 P. 1811927 OK CR 25538 Okla. Crim. 721927 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 269

Opinion of the Court — Edwards

EDWARDS, J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Carter county on a charge of willfully injuring a public building, and was sentenced to serve a term of four years in the state penitentiary.

The information was filed in the district court of Carter county April 4, 1925. Defendant was arraigned on April 16, refused to plead, and the court entered his plea of not guilty. The trial was had on April 20, and the jury returned its verdict on the same day. On April 23, defendant filed his motion for a new trial, which was overruled on April 24, and on the same day he filed a motion in arrest of judgment, which was overruled and a formal judgment and sentence entered on April 24, 1925. The case-made was completed and served on July 23, 1925, was settled, signed, and filed in the distinct court September 10, 1925, but the appeal was not lodged in this court until October 31', 1925, more than six months from the time judgment was rendered.

Section 2808, Comp. Stat. 1921, is as follows:

“In misdemeanor cases the appeal must be taken within sixty days after the judgment is rendered: Provided, however, that the trial court or judge may, for good cause shown, extend the time in which such appeal may be taken not exceeding sixty days. In felony cases the appeal must be taken within six months after the judgment is rendered, and a transcript in both felony and misdemeanor cases must be filed as hereinafter directed.”

Under this statute it has been uniformly held that, where the appeal is not filed within the time provided by law, this court does not acquire jurisdiction. This *74 has been so often decided that citation of authorities is unnecessary.

The attempted appeal is dismissed.

DOYLE, P. J., and DAVENPORT, J., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1928: 11930: 11932: 11940: 21944: 11949: 11953: 119282026peak 1940 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Johnson v. State1940 OK CR 119, 106 P.2d 128
  2. Stansbury v. State1944 OK CR 14, 146 P.2d 137
  3. Hooker v. State1949 OK CR 3, 201 P.2d 933
  4. Peyton v. State1928 OK CR 295, 270 P. 860
  5. Rogers v. State1932 OK CR 60, 8 P.2d 1111
  6. Elam v. State1940 OK CR 99, 105 P.2d 432

Most recent

  1. De Wolf v. State1953 OK CR 43, 255 P.2d 949
  2. Hooker v. State1949 OK CR 3, 201 P.2d 933
  3. Stansbury v. State1944 OK CR 14, 146 P.2d 137
  4. Johnson v. State1940 OK CR 119, 106 P.2d 128
  5. Elam v. State1940 OK CR 99, 105 P.2d 432
  6. Rogers v. State1932 OK CR 60, 8 P.2d 1111

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list