Radebaugh v. Wolfe
Samuel S. Radebaugh v. William Wolfe
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam:
This is an action instituted by William Wolfe, plaintiff in the court below, in the district court of Oklahoma county, to obtain a mandatory injunction removing the defendant below, Samuel S. Radebaugh, from a certain quarter section of land. This case is in all respects similar to the Woodruff-Wallace case, ( 3 Okla. 355 ), and the decision of the lower court was in harmony with the decision therein, and that case must control in the one under consideration. Upon the authority of Woodruff v. Wallace, supra, the judgment of the lower court will be affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.