Chicago Building & Manufacturing Co. v. Kirby
The Chicago Building and Manufacturing Company v. F. P. Kirby
Syllabus
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the court by Burwell, J.:
The facts in this case are identical with those in the case of the Chicago Building & Manufacturing Company v. Pewthers.
That case was commenced before the same justice, change of venue taken to the same probate court. The judgments in the probate and district courts are the same in both cases, and the appeal taken in the same manner. And for the reasons stated in that case, the judgment of the district court of Payne county in this case is hereby affirmed at the cost of the appellant.
It is so ordered; and the district court of Payne county is "jhereby directed to return all of the papers certified to that court by the probate court of said county, with directions to that court to return the original papers from the justice’s court to said justice.
Burford, C. J., having presided in the court below, not sitting; all of the other Justices concurring.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 10 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.