Osage Oil & Refining Co. v. McDowell
OSAGE OIL & REFINING CO. v. McDOWELL Et Al.
Opinion of the Court
Opinion by LYONS, C.
The district court of Washington county rendered judgment in this case on two promissory notes executed by the Osage Oil & Refining Company.
The petition states a good cause of action and the judgment is sustained by the evidence and is in accordance with the law and evidence. The plaintiff in error contends that the cause was wrongfully set for trial and tried without a jury, and that the proceedings of the lower court in that respect constitute reversible error.
It appears from the record in this cause that the case was set by agreement of the parties in open court for December 9, 1922, and that the parties in open court waived a jury. On December 9th the district judge was 511 and the cause was continued for this reason without objection, to the 15th day of December, 1922, on which date the court proceeded to try the cause and render judgment.
The contention of the plaintiff in error is wholly without merit, and mis might well be a proper case for the dismissal of the appeal. However, this cause is presented here by reputable counsel for plaintiff in error who did not participate in the proceedings in the court below, and we shall therefore not dismiss the appeal, but shall, instead, affirm the judgment of the lower court and render judgment also against the sureties on the supersedeas bond.
It is ordered that the cause is affirmed, and judgment is rendered against the sureties on the supersedeas bond.
By the Court: It is so ordered.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 8 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.