TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Sells v. Butts

SELLS Et Al. v. BUTTS

Sells v. Butts, 190 P. 857 (Okla. 1920)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 25, 1920
Docket
No. 9602
Judges
Bailey, Rainey, Harrison, Johnson, McNeill
Citations
190 P. 85779 Okla. 36
Disposition
Affirmed.
Syllabus
(Syllabus by the Court.) Indians — Alienation of Land — Champerty—■ Rule of Property. Same as in cause No. 9600, Pearl Sells, nee Hayes, v. Warren Mooney, this day decided, ante, p. 34.
Summary
Error from District Court, Sequoyah Counity; John H. Pitchford, Judge. Action by R. B. Butts against Pearl Sells, nee' Hayes, and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Bailey

BAILEY, J.

The pleadings, evidence, and judgment in this cause being in all material respects identical #with the pleadings, evidence, and judgment considered by this court in No. 9600, Pearl Sells, nee Hayes, et al. v. Warren Mooney, ante, p. 34, and it having-been agreed by counsel that this cause might be considered and consolidated with said cause No. 9600, for the reasons assigned in the last named cause, the judgment is affirmed.

RAINEY, C. J., and HARRISON, JOHNSON, and McNEILL, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1927: 11933: 11945: 119272026peak 1927 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Pure Oil Pipe Line Co. v. Cornish1933 OK 228, 20 P.2d 1041
  2. In re Assessment of Champlin Refining Co.1927 OK 475, 264 P. 160
  3. Fitzsimmons v. Rauch1945 OK 163, 159 P.2d 264

Most recent

  1. Fitzsimmons v. Rauch1945 OK 163, 159 P.2d 264
  2. Pure Oil Pipe Line Co. v. Cornish1933 OK 228, 20 P.2d 1041
  3. In re Assessment of Champlin Refining Co.1927 OK 475, 264 P. 160

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list