TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Zackie v. State

A. Zackie v. State.

Zackie v. State, 1919 OK CR 45, 178 P. 271
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · State Appellate Courts
Decided
February 15, 1919
Docket
No. A-3482.
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
178 P. 2711919 OK CR 4515 Okla. Crim. 4801919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 45
Disposition
Order that proceedings abate.
Syllabus
ABATEMENT OF PROSECUTION — Death of Accused. Where accused dies ponding Hie determination of liis appeal, the case, will be abated.
Summary
Appeal from Superior Court, Creek County; Gaylor R. Wilcox, Judge. A. Zackie was convicted of a violation of the prohibitory liquor law, and he appeals.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, A. Zackie, was convicted at the May term of the superior court of Creek county, sitting at Drumright, on an information charging the possession of intoxicating liquors with intent to sell the same, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury was sentenced to be confined for two months in the county jail and to pay a fine of $500. From the judgment rendered on May 16, 1918, an appeal was attempted to be taken by filing in this court on November 18, 1918, a petition in error with case-made.

*481 Counsel for plaintiff in error has filed a motion to abate, supported by the affidavit of Gaylor R. Wilcox, the trial judge, showing that on the 3rd day of December, 1918, said plaintiff in error, A. Zackie, departed this life at Drumright.

In a criminal prosecution the purpose of the proceeding being to punish the defendant in person, the action must necessarily abate upon his death, and, where it is made to appear to this court that plaintiff in error has died pending the determination qí his appeal, the case will be abated.

It is therefore adjudged and ordered that the proceedings in this case be abated, and the same is remanded, with direction to the trial court to enter its appropriate order to that effect.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list