TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Grace v. Home State Bank of Tecumseh

GRACE v. HOME STATE BANK OF TECUMSEH Et Al.

Grace v. Home State Bank of Tecumseh, 1922 OK 349, 210 P. 1022
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · State Highest Courts
Decided
December 12, 1922
Docket
No. 13681
Judges
Kane, McNeill, Miller, Kennamer, Nicholson
Citations
210 P. 10221922 OK 34988 Okla. 241922 Okla. LEXIS 313

Opinion of the Court — Kane

KANE, J.

This cause comes on to be heard upon the motion to dismiss the appeal filed by the defendant in error.

It seems that the regular trial court being disqualified, the cause was tried before J. H. Woods, Esquire, as special judge, by agreement of the parties, the judgment appealed from being rendered on the 25th day of February, 1922, and 90 days given from February 21, 1922, in Which to serve case-made.

On the 29th day of May. 1922. three days nftrtr the 90 days had expired, further order of extention was made by the regular judge, Hal Johnson, previously disqualified, and on the 15th day of August, 1922, case-made was settled and signed by the special judge, J. H. Woods.

On. the 30th day of June, 1922, MoOlaie Taylor, one of the principal defendants, died and the cause was not revived in the trial court, either against the personal represen-ative of said McClain Taylor, or his heirs. The regular judge, Hal Johnson, had no jurisdiction to make an order of extension in which to serve ease-made), for the reason that when he certified his disqualification, he was disqualified for all purposes; and for further reason, the time had expired in which the order could be made.

Where one of the parties died and the case was not revived in the trial court between the time of final judgment and the expiration of the statutory period for filing appeal in this court, the appeal will be dismissed. Skillern v. Jameson, 29 Okla. 84 , 116 Pac. 193 ; Nye v. Jones, 35 Okla. 96 , 128 Pac. 112 .

The motion is therefore sustained, and the appeal. dismissed.

McNEILL, MILLER, KENNAMER, and NICHOLSON, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1929: 11934: 119292026peak 1929 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Powers v. Holder1934 OK 333, 33 P.2d 193
  2. Eisiminger v. Jones1929 OK 218, 278 P. 1094

Most recent

  1. Powers v. Holder1934 OK 333, 33 P.2d 193
  2. Eisiminger v. Jones1929 OK 218, 278 P. 1094

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Skillern v. Jameson, 1911 OK 189, 116 P. 193 12
Nye v. Jones Et Ux., 1912 OK 768, 128 P. 112 7

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list