TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Manning v. Stroud State Bank

Manning v. Stroud State Bank, 1910 OK 235, 110 P. 650
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · State Highest Courts
Decided
July 12, 1910
Docket
No. 519
Judges
Williams
Citations
110 P. 6501910 OK 23526 Okla. 6251910 Okla. LEXIS 108
Disposition
Eeversed.
Syllabus
PLEADING — Unauthorized Verification — Judgment on Pleadings. An unverified answer embodying a plea..of non est factum having been filed and on the day the case was .set for tria-1, but before ■ -it was called for .trial, the defendant, without having first obtained leave of the court, having-verified the answer before the clerk of the court, the plaintiff; without moving to -strike the answer from the file moved for judgment on the pleadings, which was granted by the court. Held, that this was error. (Syllabus by the. Court.)
Summary
Error from District Court,"Lincoln County; W. N. Maben, Judge_ Action by the Stroud State Bank against P. C. Manning. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Williams

WILLIAMS, J.

Did the court err in rendering judgment upon the pleadings, it appearing that the answer at the time it was filed, unverified, denied the execution of the note sued on, but was sworn to by the defendant before the clerk of the court on the-day the case was called for trial, without first having obtained leave of court thereto? No motion was made to strike the answer from the files on account of such improper verification. As long as the answer remained on file verified, though without .permission of the court, it was error to render judgment for the' plaintiff against the defendant on the pleadings. 22 Ency. Pl. & Pr. p. 1048.

.The judgment of the lower court is reversed and remanded, with instructions to grant a new trial.

All the Justices concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1911: 11915: 119112026peak 1911 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Bruner1915 OK 890, 152 P. 1103
  2. Stauffer v. Campbell1911 OK 339, 118 P. 391

Most recent

  1. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Bruner1915 OK 890, 152 P. 1103
  2. Stauffer v. Campbell1911 OK 339, 118 P. 391

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list