Butts v. Rothschild Bros. Hat Co.
BUTTS Et Al. v. ROTHSCHILD BROS. HAT CO.
Syllabus
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Opinion by BLEAKMORE, C.
On appeal to this court from a judgment of the district court of Coal county, supersedeas bond was filed, executed by the plaintiffs in error as principals, and E. R. Bunch and R. A. Arnold as sureties, to stay said judgment. On July 11, 1916, there was judgment of this court against appellants ; and motion has been filed herein for judgment against the sureties on such supersedeas bond. By virtue of the provisions of chapter 249, Sess. Laws 1915, as construed in Long v. Lang & Co., 49 Okla. 342 , 152 Pac. 1078 , the motion is sustained.
Judgment is therefore entered in this court against E. R. Bunch and S. A. Arnold, in the sum of .$199.47. together with interest thereon at the rate of 6 per cent, per annum from the 29th day of September, 1914, and all costs of the action.
By the Court: It is so ordered.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.