TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Superior Smokeless Coal & Mining Co. v. Shambun

SUPERIOR SMOKELESS COAL & MINING CO. v. SHAMBUN Et Al.

Superior Smokeless Coal & Mining Co. v. Shambun, 298 P. 247 (Okla. 1931)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · State Highest Courts
Decided
April 14, 1931
Docket
No. 22024
Judges
Andrews, Lester, Riley, Hefner, Cullison, Wind, McNeill, Kornegay, Clark
Citations
298 P. 247148 Okla. 193

Opinion of the Court — Andrews

ANDREWS, J.

This is an original proceeding to review an award of the State Industrial Commission in favor of the claimant therein, respondent herein.

It is admitted that the respondent, a man of the age of 63 years, sustained an accidental personal injury while engaged in the performance of manual labor for the petitioner and that it arose out of and in the course of his employment.

The petitioner contends that the respondent has entirely and completely recovered from the injury and that it has paid compensation from the date of the injury to the date of recovery. The respondent contends that prior to the date of the injury hé was a strong and able-bodied man and had worked every day that the mine operated; that he had been employed in coal mines for a period of 40' years; that since the date of the injury the respondent had been unable to perform any kind of manual labor; that he has made numerous attempts to do so, and that his inability to work is due to his injury received as aforesaid.

The question of fact involved was determined adversely to the contention of the petitioner by the State Industrial Commission and, under the uniform holding .of this court, if there is any competent evidence reasonably tending to support the award, the same will not be disturbed by this court. Transcontinental Oil Co. v. Eoff, 126 Okla. 91 , 258 Pac. 743 .

There was competent testimony reasonably tending to show that the physical condition of the respondent prior to the injury complained of was aggravated by the injury complained of and that the injury brought about the condition in which he was at the time of the hearing and the award. That being so, the award of the Commission will not be disturbed. Christian v. Hanna, 144 Okla. 89 , 289 Pac. 708 .

The prayer of the petitioner to vacate the award of the. State Industrial Commission is denied.

LESTER, C. J., and RILEY, HEFNER, CULLISON, S WIND ALL, McNEILL, and KORNEGAY; JJ., concur. CLARK, Y. C. J., absent.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1932: 31935: 11973: 119322026peak 1932 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Protho v. Nette46 P.2d 943 (Okla. 1935)
  2. Fox-Smythe Transportation Company v. McCartney1973 OK 55, 510 P.2d 686
  3. Fairmont Creamery v. Lowe1932 OK 687, 15 P.2d 133
  4. Manhattan Construction Co. v. Tottress1932 OK 859, 17 P.2d 407
  5. Brown v. English1932 OK 659, 15 P.2d 17

Most recent

  1. Fox-Smythe Transportation Company v. McCartney1973 OK 55, 510 P.2d 686
  2. Protho v. Nette46 P.2d 943 (Okla. 1935)
  3. Manhattan Construction Co. v. Tottress1932 OK 859, 17 P.2d 407
  4. Fairmont Creamery v. Lowe1932 OK 687, 15 P.2d 133
  5. Brown v. English1932 OK 659, 15 P.2d 17

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Christian v. Hanna, 1930 OK 325, 289 P. 708 19
Transcontinental Oil Co. v. Eoff, 1927 OK 229, 258 P. 743 9

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list