TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Miller v. State

Bill Miller v. State.

Miller v. State, 1929 OK CR 15, 273 P. 374
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · State Appellate Courts
Decided
January 12, 1929
Docket
No. A-6464.
Judges
Edwards, Doyle, Davenport
Citations
273 P. 3741929 OK CR 1541 Okla. Crim. 3671929 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 163

Opinion of the Court — Edwards

EDWARDS, J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Seminole county on a charge of having the unlawful pos *368 session of intoxicating liquor and was sentenced to pay a fine of $175 and to serve 45 days in the county jail.

The judgment was entered September 21, 1926. At that time defendant was given 3'0 days in which to make and serve case-made. On October 19, a motion for additional time in which to make and serve case-made was filed asking for 30 days additional time, and on the same day the court made an order allowing 30 days additional time to make and serve case-made, with 10 days to suggest amendments, and to be settled and signed on 5 days’ notice.

The record discloses, however, that on October 15 the case-made had been served, with an acknowledgment by the county attorney of that date and that it was settled and signed by the trial judge and attested by the clerk on that date. In neither of the orders is there an extension of the time in which to file the appeal in this court. It was not filed here until January 3, 1927. In misdemeanor cases the appeal must be taken within 60 days from the date judgment is rendered unless the court or judge, for good cause shown, extend the time in which such appeal may be taken, such extension not to exceed 60 days. Section 2808, Comp. St. 1921. Under numerous holdings of this court, following the statute cited, it is settled that, unless the appeal in a misdemeanor case be taken within 60 days or within an extension of time made by the court, not to exceed 60 days additional, the appeal will be dismissed. Fenton v. State, 10 Okla. Cr. 579 , 139 P. 1155 ; Boatright v. State, 19 Okla. Cr. 97 , 198 P. 106 ; Wilson v. State, 24 Okla. Cr. 268 , 217 P. 1057 ; Jones v. State, 27 Okla. Cr. 425 , 228 P. 532 .

The appeal is dismissed.

DOYLE, P. J., and DAVENPORT, J., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1931: 21938: 21947: 11960: 119312026peak 1931 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Seabolt v. State1960 OK CR 77, 357 P.2d 1014
  2. Logan v. State1931 OK CR 367, 3 P.2d 748
  3. Powell v. State1938 OK CR 119, 85 P.2d 326
  4. Pooler v. State1947 OK CR 107, 185 P.2d 235
  5. Mann v. State1937 OK CR 222, 299 P. 237
  6. Powell v. State85 P.2d 326 (Okla. Crim. App. 1938)

Most recent

  1. Seabolt v. State1960 OK CR 77, 357 P.2d 1014
  2. Pooler v. State1947 OK CR 107, 185 P.2d 235
  3. Powell v. State1938 OK CR 119, 85 P.2d 326
  4. Powell v. State85 P.2d 326 (Okla. Crim. App. 1938)
  5. Logan v. State1931 OK CR 367, 3 P.2d 748
  6. Mann v. State1937 OK CR 222, 299 P. 237

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 4

DepthCaseCited by
Wilson v. State, 1923 OK CR 234, 217 P. 1057 11
Boatright v. State, 1921 OK CR 90, 198 P. 106 3
Fenton v. State, 1914 OK CR 36, 139 P. 1155 1
Jones v. State, 1924 OK CR 207, 228 P. 532 1

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list