TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Robinson v. State

George Robinson v. State.

Robinson v. State, 1917 OK CR 117, 165 P. 616
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · State Appellate Courts
Decided
June 2, 1917
Docket
No. A-2643.
Judges
Doyle, Armstrong, Matson
Citations
165 P. 6161917 OK CR 11713 Okla. Crim. 4661917 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 121
Disposition
Modified and affirmed.
Syllabus
APPEAL AND ERROR — 'Reduction of Sentence. Under Broc. Crim., section 6003, Rev. Laws 1910, this court in the furtherance of justice' has the power to modify, any judgment appealed from by reducing the sentence.
Summary
t Appeal' from County Court, Oklahoma‘County; .• William H: Z'wiek, Judge. \ George Robinson was convicted of a violation of the. prohibitory law, and he appeals.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Doyle

DOYLE, P. J.

The plaintiff in error,,George Robin-. ;son, was tried and convicted in the county court of Oklahoma county upon an information charging that he did have in his possession 12 bottles of beer with intent to .transport the same in violation of law. The jury failed to fix the punishment, and- he was by the court sentenced to be confined in the county jail for 60 days and to pay a .fine of $100. No brief has been filed and no appearance made for the plaintiff in error.

The evidence for the state shows that two police' officers arrested the defendant in the city of Oklahoma City and that he had in his possession twelve bottles of beer. As a witness in his own behalf, he testified that the beer was given to him by Frank Marvin, ■ and that it was for his own use;. that his parents died while he was young; that he spent about six years at an orphans’ home in Oklahoma City, and then went to work; that he was injured and was then sent, to the county poor farm. It further appears that he was tried and convicted in the municipal court for the same act- charged in the information. No material error appears in the record; but, in view of the facts disclosed, we are of the opinion that substantial justice requires a modification of the punishment imposed.

It is therefore ordered that the judgment and sentence be modified to 30 days’ confinement and a fine of $50. and thus modified the judgment is affirmed..

ARMSTRONG and MATSON,. JJ„ concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1920: 11921: 119202026peak 1920 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Felice v. State1920 OK CR 139, 194 P. 251
  2. State v. Ramirez203 P. 279 (Idaho 1921)

Most recent

  1. State v. Ramirez203 P. 279 (Idaho 1921)
  2. Felice v. State1920 OK CR 139, 194 P. 251

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list