TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

McDonald v. State

H.M. McDonald v. State.

McDonald v. State, 1924 OK CR 182, 227 P. 844
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · State Appellate Courts
Decided
July 26, 1924
Docket
No. A-4442.
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
227 P. 8441924 OK CR 18227 Okla. Crim. 3231924 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 167

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

H. M. McDonald, plaintiff in error, defendant below, was convicted of the alteration of a written instrument, a bank cheek, with his punishment fixed at confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of four years. From this judgment he appeals to this court.

Pending this appeal defendant gave a supersedeas bond obligating himself to abide the 'decision of this court, and the execution of the sentence was in the meantime suspended. Lately it has been made to appear to the court that the defendant’s whereabouts is unknown, and that he is a fugitive from justice. The Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for that reason, and because he cannot now be compelled to perform and abide by any order or judgment that might be rendered by this court on appeal.

Upon the proofs submitted and notice of service of this motion to dismiss as of July 7, 1924, the appeal is dismissed. In the event of the subsequent apprehension of the defendant, he shall be remanded to the trial court for execution of the sentence in accordance with the terms of the judgment therein rendered against him.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1928: 11929: 11964: 119282026peak 1928 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Ex Parte Adams1929 OK CR 43, 274 P. 485
  2. Ex Parte Adams1928 OK CR 117, 265 P. 147
  3. González de Jesús v. Delgado90 P.R. 30 (1964)

Most recent

  1. González de Jesús v. Delgado90 P.R. 30 (1964)
  2. Ex Parte Adams1929 OK CR 43, 274 P. 485
  3. Ex Parte Adams1928 OK CR 117, 265 P. 147

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list