Casner v. Wooley
Syllabus
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
TURNER, C. J.
On January 9, 1909, tbe special judge trying the cause, after overruling the motion for a new trial, entered .judgment against the plaintiff, taxed him with the cost, and gave him 90 days in which to prepare and serve a case-made. After •the expiration of the term, and after he had ceased to sit as such, .•said judge, on March 30, 1909, granted an extension of time for .said purpose, and the case-made in question was signed and settled by him within the time thus extended.
The petition in error should be dismissed, pursuant to the motion filed. The law in Hornor et al. v. Goltry & Sons, 23 Okla. 905, 101 Pac. 1111 , and cases there cited, govern this case.
It is so ordered.
All the Justices concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 8 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.