White v. Territory of Oklahoma
Ed. White v. the Territory of Oklahoma
Syllabus
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the court by Bureord, C. J.:
The plaintiff in error was convicted in the district court of Noble county for the crime of burglary in the second degree, and sentenced to serve a term of 5 years in the penitentiary. The judgment and sentence was entered on December 30, 1899. No brief has been filed and we are not advised what the plaintiff in error complains of, or relies upon for a reversal. In eases of this kind, we do not consider it the duty of this court to go into a careful examination of the evidence to determine whether or not the trial court erred in the admission or rejection of testimony. We have examined the indictment, the instructions of the court and the judgment and sentence, and we have discovered no error which will warrant a reversal of the judgment.
*173 The judgment of the district court of Noble county is in all things affirmed, at the cost of the plaintiff in error.
Hainer, J., who presided in the court below, not sitting; all the other Justices concurring.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.