TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Daley v. State

J.T. Daley v. State.

Daley v. State, 1923 OK CR 117, 214 P. 941
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · State Appellate Courts
Decided
May 12, 1923
Docket
No. A-4350.
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
214 P. 9411923 OK CR 11723 Okla. Crim. 3551923 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 203

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

J. T. Daley was convicted in the county court of Stephens county on the! 8th day of March, 1922, of the crime of manufacturing intoxicating liquor and punishment fixed at a fine of $400 and imprisonment in the county jail for a period of 30 days. The Attorney General, on February 22, 1923, filed a motion to. dismiss this appeal on the ground that the defendant has, pending the appeal, removed from the state of Oklahoma and is now a resident of the state of Montana.

In support of said motion the Attorney General filed an affidavit of J. A. Brown, assistant chief of police of the city of Duncan, Okla., who swears that subsequent to said conviction and appeal the said J.i T. Daley left .the state of Oklahoma and has permanently removed-therefrom and that the said J. T.¡ Daley is a resident of the city of Butte in the state of Montana and has been there for some time. No response has been made to the motion to dismiss the appeal.

Under repeated! decisions of this court, when it is shown that the defendant is a' fugitive from justice or ha-si left the jurisdiction of the state of Oklahoma and cannot be made to answer any judgment upon the merits of his appeal which may be rendered by this court, the appeal will be summarily dismissed. Boswell v. State, 14 Okla. Cr. 336 , 170 Pac. 1175 , and cases therei cited.

The plaintiff in error having failed to controvert the motion to dismiss the appeal, and it being apparent that the plaintiff in error has left thd jurisdiction of the state of Oklahoma and cannot be made to respond to any affirmative judgment which this court may render in this case, the appeal, upon the authority of the cases above cited, is dismissed for that reason.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1925: 11926: 11927: 31931: 11934: 119252026peak 1927 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Evinger v. State1926 OK CR 287, 247 P. 416
  2. Kincaid v. State1925 OK CR 193, 237 P. 131
  3. Collins v. State1934 OK 641, 37 P.2d 827
  4. Beasley v. State1931 OK CR 312, 1 P.2d 790
  5. Kirk v. State1927 OK CR 295, 259 P. 667
  6. Cooksey v. State1927 OK CR 283, 259 P. 604

Most recent

  1. Collins v. State1934 OK 641, 37 P.2d 827
  2. Beasley v. State1931 OK CR 312, 1 P.2d 790
  3. Kirk v. State1927 OK CR 295, 259 P. 667
  4. Cooksey v. State1927 OK CR 283, 259 P. 604
  5. Meyers v. State1927 OK CR 225, 258 P. 922
  6. Evinger v. State1926 OK CR 287, 247 P. 416

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Boswell v. State, 1918 OK CR 27, 170 P. 1175 6

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list