TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Hamon v. State

HAMON v. STATE Et Al.

Hamon v. State, 1917 OK 596, 169 P. 894
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · State Highest Courts
Decided
December 11, 1917
Docket
No. 9081
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
169 P. 8941917 OK 59667 Okla. 1281917 Okla. LEXIS 360
Disposition
Dismissed.
Syllabus
(Syllabus.) Appeal amd Error — Mbot Question — Dismissal, Where it is made to appear to the Supreme Court that the question involved in the appeal has become moot, the aetion may be dismissed.
Summary
Appeal from Corporation Commission. Proceeding between Jake B. Hamon and the State of Oklahoma and others. Judgment for the latter, and the former appeals.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

On November 14, 1917, the appellees, state of Oklahoma et al., filed in this court the following motion to dismiss:

“Come now appellees in the above-entitled case and represent and state to the court: That the Corporation Commission, by order No. 1299, prescribed general rules and regulations governing the operation of oil and gas wells and prescribed regulations in reference to the shooting of same. That, therefore, a 'decision of the questions involved in this appeal is not now important, so far as the question of shooting wells in the Healdton Fields is concerned, in view of order N'o. 1299 of the Corporation Commission. That order No. 1257, the order appealed from herein, has been set aside by journal entry of the Corporation Commission (copy of journal entry, together with general order No. 1299, attached hereto). Wherefore, appellees request and move that the court dismiss the proceedings and appeal! jtn the above-entitled case.”

A copy of the order setting aside order No. 1257 is attached to said motion.

It appearing that the question involved has become moot, the motion to dismiss ■the action is sustained, and said aetion is hereby dismissed..

All the Justices concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1921: 119212026peak 1921 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Parker v. U. S. Smelter Co.1921 OK 15, 194 P. 893

Most recent

  1. Parker v. U. S. Smelter Co.1921 OK 15, 194 P. 893

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list