Churchman v. Payte
Syllabus
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Opinion by ROSSER, C.
This appeal is from an order of the county court dismissing an appeal on account of a defect in the appeal bond.
The facts in this case are substantially the same as the facts in the case of Spaulding Mfg. Co. v. Roff, 34 Okla. 309 , 125 Pac. 727 . It was there held that it was the duty of the court to permit an appeal bond to be corrected or amended as provided in section 5394, Comp. Laws 1909.' 'That case has been followed in C., R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Moore, 34 Okla. 199 , 124 Pac. 898 ;
Spaulding Mfg. Co. v. Witter, 34 Okla. 313 , 125 Pac. 729 , and Roberts v. Converse, ante, 131 Pac. 539 .
This case must be reversed and remanded, with instructions to the county court of Coal county to' permit the plaintiff in error to file an amended appeal bond, and to proceed with the trial of the ease in regular course.
By the Court: It is so ordered.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.