TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Childers v. Fleetwood

Childers v. Fleetwood, 1913 OK 582, 135 P. 931
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 14, 1913
Docket
No. 2793
Judges
Harrison
Citations
135 P. 9311913 OK 58239 Okla. 4551913 Okla. LEXIS 525
Disposition
Affirmed.
Syllabus
APPEAL AND ERROR — Certificate to Transcript — Sufficiency—Dismissal. Rule 16 (38 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vii) requires transcripts of records to be certified to by the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken in order to give verity to such record and to enable this court to know that such transcript is a copy of the . record of the proceedings had below. A substantial compliance with the following certificate is sufficient: “State of Oklahoma, County of-. I, —■.—, clerk of the - court for said county, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct transcript of the record in the above-entitled cause. In testimony whereof, I hereunto set my hand and seal of this court, this - day of-. -, Clerk. ’ ’ (Syllabus by Harrison, C.)
Summary
Error from County Court, Tulsa County; N. J. Gubser, Judge. Action in Justice’s Court by W. L. Childers against Isaac Fleetwood. From an order of the County Court dismissing plaintiff’s appeal and an order refusing to reinstate the cause, plaintiff brings error.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Harrison

Opinion by HARRISON, C.

This is an appeal from an order of the county court of Tulsa county dismissing an appeal from the -justice court and from an order of the court refusing to reinstate the cause. It comes here on a purported transcript, but the' record before us is not authenticated. There is no certificate to the record before us to authenticate it as the record of the proceedings had below. Rule 16 ( 38 Okla. viii , 95 Pac. vii ) requires transcripts to be certified by the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken and prescribes the following form as sufficient:

*456 “State of Oklahoma, County of-. I,-, clerk of the-court for said county, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct transcript of the record in the above-entitled cause. In testimony whereof, I hereunto set my hand and seal of this court, this-day of-r. -, Clerk.”

A substantial compliance with this certificate is sufficient, hut it is essential that there be some certificate, in order to enable this court to know that the record before it is a record of the proceedings had below. Neither is the record sufficient as a case-made, for the reason that it contains no certificate which gives verity to the record proper.

In the absence of any such certificate, the cause must be dismissed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1915: 119152026peak 1915 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Board of Com'rs of Creek County v. State1915 OK 540, 150 P. 455

Most recent

  1. Board of Com'rs of Creek County v. State1915 OK 540, 150 P. 455

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list