TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State v. Fouts

State v. Olga Fouts.

State v. Fouts, 276 P. 683 (Or. 1929)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Oregon Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
April 3, 1929
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
276 P. 683129 Or. 1151929 Ore. LEXIS 113

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

This case involves the question of whether or not a person receiving from another a bottle of intoxicating liquor for the mere purpose of taking a drink therefrom, and then returning the bottle, is guilty of unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor. The learned circuit judge ruled against the state from which the district attorney has appealed. The learned district attorney presented a cogent and logical argument for reversing the ruling of the Circuit Court. The case is controlled, however, by the case of State v. Williams, 117 Or. 238 ( 243 Pac. 563 ). The judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1934: 11961: 119342026peak 1934 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Ibach v. Jackson35 P.2d 672 (Or. 1934)
  2. State v. Gordineer366 P.2d 161 (Or. 1961)

Most recent

  1. State v. Gordineer366 P.2d 161 (Or. 1961)
  2. Ibach v. Jackson35 P.2d 672 (Or. 1934)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
State v. Williams, 243 P. 563 (Or. 1925) 17

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list