Reihsen v. Burlingame Co.
George P. Reihsen v. the Burlingame Co.
Reihsen v. Burlingame Co., 282 P. 554 (Or. 1929)
Opinion of the Court
RAND, J.
This is a suit for rescission and a companion case to Sharkey v. The Burlingame Co.
this day decided. The two cases were argued together and upon the same testimony. The facts are identical except as to the description of the property sold and the further fact that plaintiff did not solicit others to attend the lecture' courses. The same rules were applicable to both cases and from this it follows that, since the decree in that case was affirmed, this should be and it is so ordered.
Affirmed, Belt .and Brown, JJ., absent.
Rossman, J., dissenting.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.