TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

McGrath v. Pennsylvania Sugar Co.

McGrath v. Pennsylvania Sugar Co., Appellant

McGrath v. Pa. Sugar Co., 131 A. 926 (Pa. 1925)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 25, 1925
Docket
Nos. , 341
Judges
Cueiam, Moschzisker, Frazer, Walling, Simpson, Kephart, Sadler, Schaefer
Citations
131 A. 926285 Pa. 841926 Pa. LEXIS 406

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Pee Cueiam, When this case was here before (McGrath v. Pennsylvania Sugar Company, 282 Pa. 265 ), we held that the court below had jurisdiction and that the issues involved were for the jury. A reading of the present record shows the evidence at the last trial to be at least equally as strong for plaintiff as that produced at the former trial; which is all that need be said in disposing of this appeal, except that we find no reversible error, in the charge or otherwise.

The judgment is affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1942: 11943: 119422026peak 1942 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Smith v. Pachter25 A.2d 343 (Pa. 1942)
  2. Jeffreys-Mcelrath Mfg. Co. v. Huiet27 S.E.2d 385 (Ga. 1943)

Most recent

  1. Jeffreys-Mcelrath Mfg. Co. v. Huiet27 S.E.2d 385 (Ga. 1943)
  2. Smith v. Pachter25 A.2d 343 (Pa. 1942)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
McGrath v. Pa. Sugar Co., 127 A. 780 (Pa. 1924) 43

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list