TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

American Academy of Music Appeal

American Academy of Music Appeal.

Am. Acad. of Music Appeal, 184 A. 657 (Pa. 1936)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · State Highest Courts
Decided
April 2, 1936
Docket
Nos. , 201
Judges
Kepi-Iart, Schaffer, Maxey, Drew, Linn, Stern, Barnes
Citations
184 A. 657321 Pa. 4331936 Pa. LEXIS 714

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam, This appeal is by a taxpayer from a confirmation of an assessment made by the board of revision of a building, known as the Academy of Music. Such appeal from the board of revision to the common pleas is de novo, but “the record of assessment, made by proper officers, approved by the board of revision, is prima facie evidence on appeal to the court below of the value of the property; it will be conclusive unless the evidence to rebut it establishes to the satisfaction of that court a different value”:

Westbury Apartments, Inc., App., 314 Pa. 130 . “The legislature has confided to the court of common pleas the duties of fact finder where there has been an appeal from an assessment for taxes. The proceeding in this court on appeal therefrom is not de novo”:

Edmonds’s App., 314 Pa. 382, 384 .

It is true that such factors as a bona fide offer to sell the property, the value of which is in dispute, and a general recession in the value of realty in its particular location, must be taken into consideration by the lower court in determining the fair market value of the property for the purposes of assessment. But it does not follow that these are the sole factors, as the appellant contends, nor controlling upon the court in its determination of the fair market value. These factors are to be considered in connection with and as a part of all the other evidence. The fact that the combined average value of all the properties in a particular locality has receded does not compel the conclusion that all the values of the individual properties within the limited area have declined proportionately. The exact locations, the possible *435 uses, and numerous other factors all go to explain the reason for this.

An examination of the entire record convinces us that the court below gave due and just weight to the bona fide offer of sale and the general recession of realty values in conjunction with all other material factors in arriving at the fair market value of the property in question. “In an appeal from an assessment for taxes, the findings of fact of the court below have great force, and these findings will not be set aside unless clear error is made to appear”:

Westbury Apartments, Inc., supra. We find no reason in the record to disturb the conclusion reached by the court below, and in the absence of an abuse of power, or a mistaken inference of law, all essential elements having been duly considered by .it, it is our duty to affirm the value which it placed upon the property.

Decree affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 20 cases

View all citing references →
1936: 11937: 31940: 11941: 21942: 11944: 31945: 11947: 11948: 11949: 11955: 11956: 11967: 11972: 11997: 119362026peak 1937 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. RAS Development Corp. v. Fayette County Board of Assessment Appeals704 A.2d 1130 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1997)
  2. Vollmer v. Philadelphia38 A.2d 266 (Pa. 1944)
  3. Philadelphia v. Litvin235 A.2d 157 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1967)
  4. Park Tax Assessment Case39 A.2d 601 (Pa. 1944)
  5. Rohrbach Tax Assessment Case40 A.2d 142 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1944)
  6. Herold v. Butler Board of Revision & Appeals54 A.2d 98 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1947)

Most recent

  1. RAS Development Corp. v. Fayette County Board of Assessment Appeals704 A.2d 1130 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1997)
  2. Development Co. of America, Inc. v. Board of Revision of Taxes59 Pa. D. & C.2d 480 (1972)
  3. Philadelphia v. Litvin235 A.2d 157 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1967)
  4. Brone Estate8 Pa. D. & C.2d 672 (1956)
  5. Park Drive Manor, Inc. Tax Assessment Case110 A.2d 392 (Pa. 1955)
  6. Sheldon Hotel Corp. Assessment Appeal66 A.2d 242 (Pa. 1949)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Westbury Apartments, Inc., Appeal, 170 A. 267 (Pa. 1934) 36
Edmonds's Appeal, 172 A. 103 (Pa. 1934) 18

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list