Martin v. Pittsburgh Consolidation Coal Co.
Martin, Appellant, v. Pittsburgh Consolidation Coal Co.
Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearne, This case presents the same question as Era Company, Ltd., v. Pittsburgh Consolidation Coal Co., 355 Pa. 219 . Appellant’s stock was registered in the name of a stockbroker. As beneficial owner appellant filed a written objection to the proposed corporate merger and a written demand to be paid the fair value of his stock. The registered owner, however, took no part in the objection and demand.
For the same reasons, and under the authorities cited in the Era case, the decree of the court below is affirmed at appellant’s cost.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.