Conley Et Ux. v. Simmons
Conley Et Ux. v. Simmons, Appellant; Conley Et Al. v. Simmons, Appellant
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam, June 30, 1933:
Defendant appeals from the refusal of judgment n. o. v. and a new trial in two actions, both resulting from the sáme automobile collision and tried as one in the court below.
There is nothing in the record.to justify a reversal, particularly since, on a motion for judgment non obstante veredicto, the evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to plaintiff. Assignments of error raise only questions involving facts which were properly submitted to the jury, and we find ample testimony warranting the verdicts. The evidence does not, as argued by defendant, show incontrovertible physical facts prov *250 ing the accident could not have occurred as claimed by plaintiff.
The judgments are affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.