Mills Novelty Company's Appeal

Mills Novelty Company's Appeal.

Mills Novelty Co.'s Appeal, 175 A. 548 (Pa. 1934)

Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · State Highest Courts
Decided: September 26, 1934
Docket: Nos. , 355
Judges: Drew, Frazer, Kephart, Linn, Maxey, Schaefer, Simpson
Citations: 175 A. 548316 Pa. 4491934 Pa. LEXIS 750

Cited by 20 3 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam, The opinion in this case of Judge Cunningham of the Superior Court is so full and comprehensive, concerning every feature of the controversy requiring discussion, that nothing additional to the statements therein contained need be said.

Upon that opinion the judgment and order of the Superior Court is affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 3 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(addressing Act of March 31, 1860, P.L. 398, § 60, 18 P.S. § 1445 (repealed))

In re Three PA Skill Amusement; Apl. of: Comm, No. 50 MAP 2024 (Pa. June 15, 2026)
(adopting per curiam the opinion of Judge Cunningham of the Superior Court)

Commonwealth v. Bretz, 433 A.2d 55 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1981)

Cited by 20 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

Wigton's Return30 A.2d 352 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1942)
American Telephone & Telegraph Company's Appeal191 A. 210 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1937)
Commonwealth v. Blythe115 A.2d 906 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1955)
Schuettler v. Maurer46 A.2d 586 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1946)
American Legion Post No. 51 Appeal149 A.2d 483 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1959)
Commonwealth v. Bretz433 A.2d 55 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1981)

Most recent

POM of PA v. Dep't of Rev.; Apl. of: Dep't of Rev.No. 2 EAP 2024 (Pa. June 15, 2026)
In re Three PA Skill Amusement; Apl. of: CommNo. 50 MAP 2024 (Pa. June 15, 2026)
Commonwealth v. Bretz433 A.2d 55 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1981)
Commonwealth v. Spisak69 Pa. D. & C.2d 659 (1974)
Gazo Appeal28 Pa. D. & C.2d 431 (Carbon Cty. Ct. Qtr. Sess. 1962)
In re American Legion Post No. 10925 Pa. D. & C.2d 572 (Cumberland Cty. Ct. Qtr. Sess. 1961)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list