TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Zagwisky v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.

Zagwisky v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co., Appellant

Zagwisky v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co., 144 A. 829 (Pa. 1928)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 28, 1928
Docket
Nos. , 314
Judges
Moschzisker, Frazer, Walling, Simpson, Kephart, Sadler, Schaffer
Citations
144 A. 829295 Pa. 711929 Pa. LEXIS 625

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam, Claimant’s deceased husband, Michael Zagwisky, met with an accident in the course of his employment on December 5, 1927, when, while engaged in lifting a plank, his foot slipped, occasioning a strain of his side. After treatment at home, he was admitted to a hospital on December 19, 1927, and died of pneumonia on January 8, 1928. The referee made an award in claimant’s favor, which was sustained by the board. Defendant appealed to the court below, which affirmed the board and entered judgment on the award; defendant has appealed to this court and contends that the expert medical testimony was insufficient in law to connect the cause of death with the accident. We agree with the court below that “connection between the accident and the death is clearly established by competent evidence.”

The judgment is affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1929: 11932: 11935: 119292026peak 1929 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Lacey v. Washburn & Williams Co.164 A. 724 (Pa. 1932)
  2. Melini v. Saltslburg Coal Mining Co.181 A. 330 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1935)
  3. Ripani v. Dittman146 A. 562 (Pa. 1929)

Most recent

  1. Melini v. Saltslburg Coal Mining Co.181 A. 330 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1935)
  2. Lacey v. Washburn & Williams Co.164 A. 724 (Pa. 1932)
  3. Ripani v. Dittman146 A. 562 (Pa. 1929)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list