TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Commonwealth v. Artz

Commonwealth v. Artz Et Al., Appellants

Commonwealth v. Artz, 132 A. 575 (Pa. 1926)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 26, 1926
Docket
Nos. , 18
Judges
Moschzisker, Frazer, Walling, Simpson, Kephart, Sadler
Citations
132 A. 575285 Pa. 5211926 Pa. LEXIS 481

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam, This case involves a similar state of facts to those in Commonwealth v. Dietz (No. 19, March Term, 1926); hence the same rules of law apply as are discussed at length in that case, where we have this day filed an opinion.

The decree is affirmed at cost of appellants.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list