Kerr Et Ux. v. Hofer (Et Al.)
Kerr Et Ux. v. Hofer (Et Al., Apellant).
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam, It is contended by appellant that the court below abused its discretion and acted in an arbitrary manner in granting two new trials in this case. In its opinion following the last trial, the court states, “the interests of right and justice require that this case should be retried.” We will not interfere with the action of the trial court under such circumstances:
Reese v. Pittsburgh Rys. Co., 336 Pa. 299 , 9 A. 2d 394 .
Order affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 11 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.