TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Stamper v. Kogelschatz

Stamper v. Kogelschatz, Appellant

Stamper v. Kogelschatz, 137 A. 127 (Pa. 1927)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 3, 1927
Docket
Nos. , 319
Judges
Moschzisker, Frazer, Walling, Simpson, Kephart, Sadler, Schaffer
Citations
137 A. 127289 Pa. 941927 Pa. LEXIS 529

Opinion of the Court — Simpson

Opinion by Mr. Justice Simpson, Appearing specially for the purpose, defendant filed an affidavit of defense raising a question of law as to whether or not the summons in the case, which had been issued by one of the courts of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, had been properly served in Montgomery County, by its sheriff, upon special deputizalion by the sheriff of the former county. The court below overruled defendant’s contention, and gave him fifteen- days to file an affidavit of defense on the merits. Without doing this, he prosecuted the present appeal.

The judgment thus entered is interlocutory, and, under the circumstances here appearing, an appeal cannot properly be taken therefrom until after a final judgment has been entered in the case: Miller Paper Co. v. Keystone Coal & Coke Co., 275 Pa. 40 ; American Trust Co. v. Kaufman, 279 Pa. 230, 233 .

The Act of March 5, 1925, P. L. 23, does not aid defendant. Proceedings under it can only be “by petition setting forth the facts relied upon, whereupon a rule to show cause shall be granted, and such preliminary question [of jurisdiction over the defendant, or of the cause of action for which suit is brought] disposed of by the court.” No such course was pursued in the instant case, *96 and hence the statute cannot be invoked to sustain the present appeal: Wilson v. Garland, 267 Pa. 291 .

The appeal is quashed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 11 cases

View all citing references →
1927: 11928: 11929: 11930: 11931: 11933: 11938: 21941: 11944: 11957: 119272026peak 1938 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Creighan v. Pittsburgh132 A.2d 867 (Pa. 1957)
  2. Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. v. Berkin149 A. 470 (Pa. 1930)
  3. Hamilton v. Police Beneficiary Ass'n40 A.2d 152 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1944)
  4. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. Johnston & Harder, Inc.330 Pa. 336 (1938)
  5. Mass. B. I. Co. v. J. H., Inc.199 A. 216 (Pa. 1938)
  6. Lewis v. Beatty159 A. 441 (Pa. 1931)

Most recent

  1. Creighan v. Pittsburgh132 A.2d 867 (Pa. 1957)
  2. Hamilton v. Police Beneficiary Ass'n40 A.2d 152 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1944)
  3. Stokes v. Giarraputo & Son42 Pa. D. & C. 597 (1941)
  4. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. Johnston & Harder, Inc.330 Pa. 336 (1938)
  5. Mass. B. I. Co. v. J. H., Inc.199 A. 216 (Pa. 1938)
  6. Nagle v. Nagle166 A. 649 (Pa. 1933)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Frank P. Miller Paper Co. v. Keystone Coal & Coke Co., 118 A. 565 (Pa. 1922) 30
O'Connell v. Cease, 110 A. 266 (Pa. 1920) 19
Am. Trust Co. v. Kaufman, 123 A. 785 (Pa. 1924) 15

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list