In re Escheat of Moneys in Custody of United States Treasury
In Re Escheat of Moneys in Custody of United States Treasury.
Subsequent history: rev'd sub nom. United States v. Klein, 303 U.S. 276 (1938). (read from the later opinion; check before relying)
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam, The previous history of this deposit is set forth in In re Escheat of Moneys in Custody of U. S. Treasury, 322 Pa. 481 . We there held that the court below had jurisdiction to decide under State laws the ownership of the fund and the record was remanded to determine whether or not the money was escheated.
This appeal restates the arguments of the United States against the jurisdiction of the court below. Since no new matter is presented, we affirm so much of the decree of the court as follows:
“Whereas, in the matter of Alice Frances Brown et al. v. Pennsylvania Canal Company et al., No. 677 in equity, of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, moneys in the amount of $16,874.49 were paid into the Registry of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on January 22,1919, and “Whereas, thereafter, on June 26, 1936, these moneys were deposited to the credit of the Treasury of the United States, subject to the order of the Court from which the said moneys were received, to wit, the aforementioned United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, under the provisions of the Act of Congress of March 3, 1911, C. 224, Revised Statutes 996; 36 Statutes 1083, 28 United States Code 852, and “Whereas, the original owners of the said moneys have been unknown for a space of seven years and more, the said sum of $16,874.49 is hereby declared escheated to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and Philip Klein, Escheator, duly appointed under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to prosecute the claim of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to these moneys Decree as stated affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 9 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Supreme Court1
- U.S. Courts of Appeals2
- State Highest Courts3
- State Appellate Courts1
- State Trial Courts2
Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.