TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Brubaker Estate

Brubaker Estate.

Brubaker Estate, 30 A.2d 135 (Pa. 1943)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 18, 1943
Docket
Nos. , 18
Judges
Maxey, Drew, Linn, Stern, Patterson, Parker, Stearns
Citations
30 A.2d 135346 Pa. 3391943 Pa. LEXIS 331

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam, This appeal is from an order of the Orphans’ Court of Lycoming County dismissing exceptions of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to an auditor’s report disallowing a claim of $3,170.20, presented by the Commonwealth against the Estate of Herbert M. Brubaker, deceased, for expenses incurred by it in the maintenance of decedent’s insane and indigent son at the Danville State Hospital for the Insane from January 5, 1931, to January 7, 1941, the date of decedent’s death. This son was committed to the Hospital upon an order made on January 5, 1931, by the Court of Quarter Sessions of Lycoming County, which placed the costs of maintenance on the county. The order was never revised or challenged and for that reason, the Orphans’ Court upheld the auditor in disallowing the claim.

The Act of June 1, 1915, P. L. 661, imposes liability for the support of an indigent, insane child, in the interest of the Commonwealth, on, inter alia, its parent. The fact that there has been no effort to enforce this liability during the lifetime of the parent does not bar the enforcement of such liability by appropriate proceedings against the parent’s estate;

Harnish’s Estate, 268 *341 Pa. 128. The subsequent Act of July 11,1923, P. L. 998, known as The Mental Health Act, does not take away this right of the Commonwealth to present claims for expenses incurred in the maintenance of indigent, insane persons against their parents’ estate even though no effort to enforce such claims was made during the latters’ lifetime. Had the attention of the court below been called to our decision in Ilarnish’s Estate, supra, it would have undoubtedly so held in the instant case.

The order of the court below is reversed and the record is remitted with directions to make distribution in accordance with this opinion.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 10 cases

View all citing references →
1943: 21947: 11950: 11951: 11954: 11957: 11960: 11965: 11971: 119432026peak 1943 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Stoner Estate56 A.2d 250 (Pa. 1947)
  2. Chesney's Estate47 Pa. D. & C. 261 (1943)
  3. Krall's Estate47 Pa. D. & C. 295 (1943)
  4. Commonwealth v. Rumford71 Pa. D. & C. 359 (1950)
  5. Gellnek Estate75 Pa. D. & C. 219 (1951)
  6. Ercolini Estate1 Pa. D. & C.2d 256 (1954)

Most recent

  1. Commonwealth v. Heiser53 Pa. D. & C.2d 124 (1971)
  2. Snyder Estate34 Pa. D. & C.2d 637 (1965)
  3. Chambers Estate22 Pa. D. & C.2d 320 (1960)
  4. Low Estate15 Pa. D. & C.2d 375 (1957)
  5. Ercolini Estate1 Pa. D. & C.2d 256 (1954)
  6. Gellnek Estate75 Pa. D. & C. 219 (1951)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Herriman v. Wilson Et Ux., 18 A.2d 670 (Pa. 1941) 2

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list